Documents
General Dynamics Land Systems
M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams
Latest production standard of the U.S. Army's M1 Abrams main battle tank, featuring an improved armor package, third-generation FLIR and vehicle health monitoring. It retains the 120 mm smoothbore gun and gas-turbine propulsion that have defined the Abrams line since 1980.
In service since 2017 · 8 operator countries
Compiled from public sources ·primary reference ↗ ·last verified 2026-07-01
67
km/h
426
km range
23.8
hp/t
120
mm gun
66,800
kg
💲 ≈ $10,500,000, Approximate per-unit SEPv3 upgrade cost
Procurement snapshot
Availability & export
US ITAR-controlled
Export needs U.S. State Dept (DDTC) approval; end-use & re-transfer restrictions apply.
Channel: Foreign Military Sales (FMS) or Direct Commercial Sale
Fielded & proven
Established · 8 operators
In service since 2017. Status: active · ~10,300 built.
Lifecycle cost (est.)
$26M – $37M
Acquisition is only ~30% of lifecycle cost, operating & support dominate over ~30 yrs. Rough 2.5–3.5× the unit price. How we estimate this →
Interoperability
Derived guidance from public data, export regime by country of origin, lifecycle from the GAO ~30% acquisition rule. Verify eligibility, pricing and offsets with the manufacturer and your acquisition authority.
Overview
The M1A2 SEP v3 (now designated M1A2C) is the most advanced fielded version of the American Abrams, a tank whose design philosophy prizes crew protection and a powerful sensor-and-fire-control suite. It retains the 120mm M256 smoothbore gun and the gas-turbine engine that has defined the Abrams since the 1980s, but adds upgraded armour, better power generation, an ammunition data link for programmable rounds, and improved networking and diagnostics.
Built by General Dynamics Land Systems, the Abrams remains the backbone of US Army armour and serves with allies including Australia, Poland and several Gulf states. The SEP v3 is a bridge toward the leaner, lighter M1E3 concept, which is intended to address the platform's considerable weight and fuel demands.
A small number of Abrams were supplied to Ukraine in 2023 and saw combat in 2024, with several lost to drones, mines and anti-tank missiles. Those losses fed a wider debate about the survivability of heavy armour on a battlefield saturated with cheap loitering munitions, reinforcing the case for the Army's move toward a next-generation design.
Compatible munitions & weapons
Publicly reported weapons the M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams can carry. Linked items have a full spec page.
Powerplant
The M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams's engine has its own full spec page.
Full specifications
Performance
Speed, range, altitude and engagement capability.
| Max speed Maximum level speed. For aircraft this is at optimal altitude; for ground vehicles, top road speed. Higher means faster response and better kinematic performance. | 67 km/h |
|---|---|
| Range Maximum distance: ferry range for aircraft, operational range for vehicles, maximum engagement distance for missiles. Higher means more standoff or persistence. | 426 km |
| Power-to-weight Engine power per tonne of vehicle weight. Higher means better acceleration and cross-country mobility. | 23.8 hp/t |
| Muzzle velocity Projectile speed leaving the barrel. Higher means flatter trajectory and better armor penetration. | 1,655 m/s |
Firepower
Armament, payload and guidance.
| Main armament Primary weapon: main gun, cannon or missile type. | 120 mm M256A1 smoothbore cannon |
|---|---|
| Secondary armament Additional weapons: coaxial MG, remote weapon station, gun pods. | .50 cal M2 + 2x 7.62 mm M240 machine guns |
| Caliber Bore diameter of the main gun or rifle. Larger throws heavier projectiles; not simply better, ammunition commonality matters. | 120 mm |
| Ammunition Rounds carried (main gun) or standard magazine capacity. | 42 |
Protection
Armor, countermeasures and survivability.
| Armor Armor technology: composite, modular, ERA-fitted, uranium-ceramic. Exact compositions are classified. | Composite armor with third-generation depleted-uranium mesh inserts |
|---|---|
| Active protection Hard-kill APS (Trophy, Arena, Afganit) intercepts incoming projectiles before impact. | Trophy |
| Reactive armor Explosive reactive armor (ERA) blocks that disrupt shaped-charge jets. | No |
| Countermeasures Self-protection: chaff, flares, DIRCM, towed decoys, smoke dischargers, jammers. | smoke grenade launchers, Trophy APS |
| NBC protection Sealed crew compartment with overpressure filtration for nuclear/biological/chemical environments. | Yes |
Physical
Dimensions, weight and crew.
| Length Overall length including gun/probe where applicable. | 9.77 m |
|---|---|
| Width Overall width, matters for rail/road transport of vehicles. | 3.66 m |
| Height Overall height. Lower profile is harder to spot and hit for ground vehicles. | 2.44 m |
| Combat weight Fully loaded weight. Lighter eases transport and bridging limits; heavier often means more armor. | 66,800 kg |
| Crew Personnel required to operate. Fewer reduces exposure; autoloaders trade a loader for mechanical complexity. | 4 |
Propulsion
Engine, power and fuel.
| Engine Powerplant model and type. | Honeywell AGT1500 gas turbine |
|---|---|
| Engine power Engine output power. Higher moves more weight faster. | 1,500 hp |
| Fuel capacity Internal fuel volume. | 1,900 L |
| Propulsion type Turbofan, turboshaft, diesel, gas turbine, solid-fuel rocket, ramjet… | Gas turbine |
Sensors & avionics
Radar, sensor suite and datalinks.
| Sensors IRST, EO/IR turrets, laser designators, sniper pods, thermal sights. | third-generation FLIR, commander's independent thermal viewer |
|---|---|
| Thermal imaging Thermal sights for night and obscured-visibility operations. | Yes |
Program
Cost, production scale and operators.
| Unit cost Approximate flyaway/unit cost where public. Defense pricing varies hugely by contract, offsets and configuration. Lower is cheaper. | $10,500,000 |
|---|---|
| Units built Total production run. Higher means proven manufacturing, mature logistics and spares availability. | 10,300 |
| Operator countries Number of countries operating the system. More operators means broader support ecosystem. | 8 |
Specifications compiled from public General Dynamics Land Systems and reference sources ↗. Published defense figures are approximations, treat comparisons as directional. Last verified 2026-07-01.
Compare with rivals
See how it stacks up
Head-to-head comparisons
M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams vs
Frequently asked questions
What is the top speed of the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams has a maximum speed of 67 km/h.
What is the range of the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams has a maximum range of 426 km.
How much does the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams weigh? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams has a combat weight of 66,800 kg.
How many crew does the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams require? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams requires a crew of 4.
What is the main armament of the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams's primary weapon is the 120 mm M256A1 smoothbore cannon.
What engine does the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams use? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams is powered by the Honeywell AGT1500 gas turbine.
What is the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams used for? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams is a main battle tank typically used for anti armor, infantry combat.
How many countries operate the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams is operated by 8 countries.
How much does the General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams cost? +
The General Dynamics Land Systems M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams has an approximate unit cost of 10,500,000 USD. Defense pricing varies by contract, offsets and configuration, treat this as directional.
Similar systems
General Dynamics Land Systems
M1A2 SEP v2 Abrams
Uralvagonzavod
T-90M
General Dynamics Land Systems
M1A1 Abrams
General Dynamics Land Systems
M60A3 Patton
Related coverage
M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams in the news
Article industry · Aug 11, 2026
Only 5 of 57 Tanks in Our Database Still Run a Gas Turbine
Only 5 of 57 database tanks still run a gas turbine, all Abrams or T-80. The M1E3 is swapping its AGT1500 turbine for a hybrid diesel drivetrain.
Article industry · Aug 9, 2026
The Armor Number No Tank Will Publish
Zero of 134 tanks and IFVs in our database publish an armor thickness figure. The only protection rating that appears at all tops out at 32 tonnes.
News exercise · Aug 8, 2026
Taiwan War-Games Wartime Arms Production, Debuts Abrams
Han Kuang 42 tests relocating Taipei's 202nd Arsenal and drafting civilian factories as M1A2T Abrams tanks join the drills for the first time.
Article guide · Aug 3, 2026
Why a Guided Missile Beats Every Tank Round on Paper
Of 39 anti-armor rounds in our database, the top penetration claim belongs to a 400 m/s guided missile, not a faster kinetic dart.
Article comparison · Aug 1, 2026
20 of 20: Every 125mm Tank Gun Can Fire a Missile
Every 125mm-gun tank in the WeaponSpecs database can fire a missile through its main gun. Only 5 of 24 120mm tanks can. The gap is doctrine, not caliber.
Article guide · Jul 31, 2026
Active Protection: Just 7 of 133 Are Combat-Proven
Of 133 tanks and IFVs in the database, only 7 field Trophy, the one active protection system with an independently reported combat record.
Article guide · Jul 20, 2026
3-Crew vs 4-Crew Tanks: What the Difference Buys You
Our analysis of 56 tanks in the WeaponSpecs database finds crew size splits exactly 28-28 between 3-person autoloader and 4-person manual-loader crews.
Article industry · Jul 18, 2026
The AK-47 Outproduces Every Tank and Jet Combined
WeaponSpecs data shows the AK-47 alone at 75 million units built, more than every tank, jet, helicopter, IFV, warship, and submarine combined.
Article guide · Jul 13, 2026
The 10 Best Main Battle Tanks of 2026, Ranked
A 10-to-1 countdown of the best main battle tanks of 2026, judged on combat record, protection, mobility and logistics, not brochure specs.
Article comparison · Jul 5, 2026
M1A2 Abrams vs T-90M vs Type 99A: Tank Power-to-Weight
The M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams is the heaviest of the three at 66.8 tonnes, giving it the lowest power-to-weight ratio despite the most powerful engine.
Article guide · Jul 3, 2026
Tank Armor Explained: Composite, ERA & Active Protection
Tank armor explained: composite (Chobham-type), reactive (ERA), and active protection systems like Trophy, layered against modern threats.
Article buying · Jul 3, 2026
Why Sustainment Is 70% of a Weapon's Real Cost
Purchase price is the tip of the iceberg. GAO data shows sustainment eats ~70% of a weapon's lifecycle cost, here's the real total-cost-of-ownership math.
Article comparison · Jul 3, 2026
Leopard 2A7 vs Abrams vs Leclerc XLR
Leopard 2A7, M1A2 SEP v3 Abrams, Leclerc XLR, and Challenger 3 compared on firepower, armor, mobility, and cost.
News digest · Feb 1, 2026
January 2026 in defense: Taiwan drills, M1E3, new US strategy
China ran its largest Taiwan blockade rehearsal yet, the US Army unrolled a next-generation tank five years early, and a new National Defense Strategy said Europe can no longer assume US conventional primacy.