Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3 vs Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf
Compare systems side by side
Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict — every number from public sources.
1
Add systems
Search here or add from any product page
2
See winners
Relative bars + who wins each metric
3
Decide
Verdict, spec profile, per-spec winners
Full data
Full spec sheet
 Raytheon (RTX) Patriot PAC-3
Wins 1/8 |  Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf
Wins 7/8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Max speed (Mach) (Mach) | 5 Mach | 14 Mach ✓ |
| Engagement range (km) | 60 km | 400 km ✓ |
| Engagement altitude (m) | 24,000 m | 30,000 m ✓ |
| Simultaneous targets | 8 | 36 ✓ |
| Firepower | ||
| Warhead (kg) | 74 kg | 180 kg ✓ |
| Sensors & avionics | ||
| Radar range (km) | 170 km | 600 km ✓ |
| Program | ||
| Unit cost (USD) | $1,100,000,000 | $500,000,000 ✓ |
| Operator countries | 19 ✓ | 4 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper? +
The Almaz-Antey S-400 Triumf has the lower public unit-cost figure at 500,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional — defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring
