Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM vs MBDA Exocet AM39
Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM and MBDA Exocet AM39 are both missile, compared here on public specifications. The Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM leads on range (148 vs 70 km).
Compare systems side by side
Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.
Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →
Full data
Full spec sheet
 Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM
Wins 2/3 |  MBDA Exocet AM39
Wins 1/3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Max speed (Mach) (Mach) | 2 Mach ✓ | 0.93 Mach |
| Range (km) | 148 km ✓ | 70 km |
| Firepower | ||
| Warhead (kg) | 68 kg | 165 kg ✓ |
| Physical | ||
| Length (m) | 4.17 m | 4.69 m |
| Combat weight (kg) | 361 kg | 670 kg |
| Program | ||
| Unit cost (USD) | $870,000 | N/A |
| Operator countries | 4 | N/A |
Frequently asked questions
Which has the longer range? +
The Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM has the longest range at 148 km.
Which is cheaper? +
The Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM has the lower public unit-cost figure at 870,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.
Which has the higher max speed (mach)? +
The Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM has the higher max speed (mach) at 2 Mach.
Which has the higher warhead? +
The MBDA Exocet AM39 has the higher warhead at 165 kg.
Is the Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM better than the MBDA Exocet AM39? +
On the public specs we track, the Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM leads on 2 of 3 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring
