WeaponSpecs

Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER vs MBDA Exocet AM39

Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER and MBDA Exocet AM39 are both missile, compared here on public specifications. The Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER leads on range (270 vs 70 km).

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER Wins 2/3
MBDA Exocet AM39 Wins 1/3
Performance
Max speed (km/h) 855 km/h N/A
Max speed (Mach) (Mach) 0.7 Mach 0.93 Mach
Range (km) 270 km 70 km
Firepower
Warhead (kg) 360 kg 165 kg
Physical
Length (m) 4.37 m 4.69 m
Combat weight (kg) 675 kg 670 kg

Frequently asked questions

Which is faster, Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER and MBDA Exocet AM39? +

The Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER is the fastest of the 2 compared here, at 855 km/h.

Which has the longer range? +

The Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER has the longest range at 270 km.

Which has the higher max speed (mach)? +

The MBDA Exocet AM39 has the higher max speed (mach) at 0.93 Mach.

Which has the higher warhead? +

The Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER has the higher warhead at 360 kg.

Is the Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER better than the MBDA Exocet AM39? +

On the public specs we track, the Boeing AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER leads on 2 of 3 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads