WeaponSpecs

Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM vs Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW

Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM and Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW are both missile, compared here on public specifications. The Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM leads on range (148 vs 130 km).

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM Wins 1/4
Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW Wins 3/4
Performance
Max speed (Mach) (Mach) 2 Mach N/A
Range (km) 148 km 130 km
Firepower
Warhead (kg) 68 kg 483 kg
Physical
Length (m) 4.17 m 4.06 m
Combat weight (kg) 361 kg 497 kg
Program
Unit cost (USD) $870,000 $719,012
Operator countries 4 10

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer range? +

The Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM has the longest range at 148 km.

Which is cheaper? +

The Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW has the lower public unit-cost figure at 719,012 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Which has the higher warhead? +

The Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW has the higher warhead at 483 kg.

Which has the higher operator countries? +

The Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW has the higher operator countries at 10.

Is the Northrop Grumman AGM-88E AARGM better than the Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW? +

On the public specs we track, the Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW leads on 3 of 4 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads