WeaponSpecs

BrahMos Aerospace BrahMos vs Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER

BrahMos Aerospace BrahMos and Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER are both missile, compared here on public specifications. The Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER leads on range (925 vs 450 km).

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

BrahMos Aerospace BrahMos Wins 1/5
Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER Wins 4/5
Performance
Max speed (Mach) (Mach) 2.8 Mach 0.8 Mach
Range (km) 450 km 925 km
Firepower
Warhead (kg) 200 kg 450 kg
Physical
Length (m) 8.4 m 4.27 m
Combat weight (kg) 2,500 kg 1,043 kg
Program
Unit cost (USD) $2,700,000 $1,400,000
Units built 1,000 N/A
Operator countries 3 6

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer range? +

The Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER has the longest range at 925 km.

Which is cheaper? +

The Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER has the lower public unit-cost figure at 1,400,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Which has the higher max speed (mach)? +

The BrahMos Aerospace BrahMos has the higher max speed (mach) at 2.8 Mach.

Which has the higher warhead? +

The Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER has the higher warhead at 450 kg.

Which has the higher operator countries? +

The Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER has the higher operator countries at 6.

Is the BrahMos Aerospace BrahMos better than the Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER? +

On the public specs we track, the Lockheed Martin AGM-158B JASSM-ER leads on 4 of 5 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads