WeaponSpecs

Kalashnikov Concern PKM vs IWI Uzi

Kalashnikov Concern PKM and IWI Uzi are both rifle & long arms, compared here on public specifications. The Kalashnikov Concern PKM leads on effective range (1,000 vs 200 m).

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

Kalashnikov Concern PKM Wins 4/7
IWI Uzi Wins 3/7
Performance
Effective range (m) 1,000 m 200 m
Rate of fire (rpm) 650 rpm 600 rpm
Muzzle velocity (m/s) 825 m/s 400 m/s
Firepower
Caliber (mm) 7.6 mm 9 mm
Ammunition 100 32
Physical
Length (m) 1.17 m 0.64 m
Empty weight (kg) 8 kg 4 kg
Crew 1 1
Program
Unit cost (USD) $3,000 $800
Units built 1,000,000 10,000,000
Operator countries 50 90

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper? +

The IWI Uzi has the lower public unit-cost figure at 800 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Which has the higher effective range? +

The Kalashnikov Concern PKM has the higher effective range at 1,000 m.

Which has the higher rate of fire? +

The Kalashnikov Concern PKM has the higher rate of fire at 650 rpm.

Which has the higher muzzle velocity? +

The Kalashnikov Concern PKM has the higher muzzle velocity at 825 m/s.

Which has the higher ammunition? +

The Kalashnikov Concern PKM has the higher ammunition at 100.

Which has the higher units built? +

The IWI Uzi has the higher units built at 10,000,000.

Is the Kalashnikov Concern PKM better than the IWI Uzi? +

On the public specs we track, the Kalashnikov Concern PKM leads on 4 of 6 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads