WeaponSpecs

Raytheon (RTX) Patriot GEM-T vs Almaz-Antey S-300V4

Full specs: Raytheon (RTX) Patriot GEM-T Almaz-Antey S-300V4

Raytheon (RTX) Patriot GEM-T and Almaz-Antey S-300V4 are both air defense system, compared here on public specifications. The Almaz-Antey S-300V4 leads on engagement range (400 vs 150 km). Several Russia-origin figures here are manufacturer or state claims with limited independent verification, so treat this comparison as directional.

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

Raytheon (RTX) Patriot GEM-T Wins 1/7
Almaz-Antey S-300V4 Wins 6/7
Performance
Max speed (Mach) (Mach) 5 Mach 7.5 Mach
Engagement range (km) 150 km 400 km
Engagement altitude (m) 24,000 m 30,000 m
Simultaneous targets 8 24
Firepower
Warhead (kg) 91 kg 150 kg
Sensors & avionics
Radar range (km) 170 km 350 km
Program
Operator countries 10 2

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer engagement range? +

The Almaz-Antey S-300V4 has the longest engagement range at 400 km.

Which has the higher max speed (mach)? +

The Almaz-Antey S-300V4 has the higher max speed (mach) at 7.5 Mach.

Which has the higher simultaneous targets? +

The Almaz-Antey S-300V4 has the higher simultaneous targets at 24.

Which has the higher warhead? +

The Almaz-Antey S-300V4 has the higher warhead at 150 kg.

Which has the higher engagement altitude? +

The Almaz-Antey S-300V4 has the higher engagement altitude at 30,000 m.

Which has the higher radar range? +

The Almaz-Antey S-300V4 has the higher radar range at 350 km.

Is the Raytheon (RTX) Patriot GEM-T better than the Almaz-Antey S-300V4? +

On the public specs we track, the Almaz-Antey S-300V4 leads on 6 of 6 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads