WeaponSpecs

Otokar Arma vs Rheinmetall Puma

Otokar Arma and Rheinmetall Puma are both ifv / apc, compared here on public specifications. The Otokar Arma leads on range (700 vs 400 km).

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

Otokar Arma Wins 4/5
Rheinmetall Puma Wins 1/5
Performance
Max speed (km/h) 105 km/h 70 km/h
Range (km) 700 km 400 km
Power-to-weight (hp/t) 20 hp/t 27.3 hp/t
Firepower
Caliber (mm) N/A 30 mm
Ammunition N/A 200
Physical
Length (m) 7.3 m 7.4 m
Combat weight (kg) 22,000 kg 43,000 kg
Crew 2 3
Troop capacity 10 6
Propulsion
Engine power (hp) N/A 1,088 hp
Program
Unit cost (USD) N/A $10,000,000
Units built N/A 350
Operator countries 4 1

Frequently asked questions

Which is faster, Otokar Arma and Rheinmetall Puma? +

The Otokar Arma is the fastest of the 2 compared here, at 105 km/h.

Which has the longer range? +

The Otokar Arma has the longest range at 700 km.

Which is cheaper? +

The Rheinmetall Puma has the lower public unit-cost figure at 10,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Which has the higher power-to-weight? +

The Rheinmetall Puma has the higher power-to-weight at 27.3 hp/t.

Which has the higher troop capacity? +

The Otokar Arma has the higher troop capacity at 10.

Which has the higher operator countries? +

The Otokar Arma has the higher operator countries at 4.

Is the Otokar Arma better than the Rheinmetall Puma? +

On the public specs we track, the Otokar Arma leads on 4 of 5 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads