WeaponSpecs

MKE MPT-76 vs Remington Arms 870

Full specs: MKE MPT-76 Remington Arms 870

MKE MPT-76 and Remington Arms 870 are both rifle & long arms, compared here on public specifications. The MKE MPT-76 leads on effective range (600 vs 40 m).

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

MKE MPT-76 Wins 3/5
Remington Arms 870 Wins 2/5
Performance
Effective range (m) 600 m 40 m
Rate of fire (rpm) 750 rpm N/A
Muzzle velocity (m/s) 810 m/s 400 m/s
Firepower
Caliber (mm) 7.6 mm 18.5 mm
Ammunition 20 7
Physical
Length (m) 1 m 1 m
Empty weight (kg) 4 kg 3 kg
Crew 1 1
Program
Unit cost (USD) N/A $450
Units built 50,000 11,000,000
Operator countries 5 30

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper? +

The Remington Arms 870 has the lower public unit-cost figure at 450 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Which has the higher effective range? +

The MKE MPT-76 has the higher effective range at 600 m.

Which has the higher muzzle velocity? +

The MKE MPT-76 has the higher muzzle velocity at 810 m/s.

Which has the higher ammunition? +

The MKE MPT-76 has the higher ammunition at 20.

Which has the higher units built? +

The Remington Arms 870 has the higher units built at 11,000,000.

Which has the higher operator countries? +

The Remington Arms 870 has the higher operator countries at 30.

Is the MKE MPT-76 better than the Remington Arms 870? +

On the public specs we track, the MKE MPT-76 leads on 3 of 5 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads