WeaponSpecs

Colt M4A1 vs Remington Arms 870

Colt M4A1 and Remington Arms 870 are both rifle & long arms, compared here on public specifications. The Colt M4A1 leads on effective range (500 vs 40 m).

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

Colt M4A1 Wins 4/6
Remington Arms 870 Wins 2/6
Performance
Effective range (m) 500 m 40 m
Rate of fire (rpm) 950 rpm N/A
Muzzle velocity (m/s) 884 m/s 400 m/s
Firepower
Caliber (mm) 5.6 mm 18.5 mm
Ammunition 30 7
Physical
Length (m) 0.84 m 1 m
Empty weight (kg) 3 kg 3 kg
Crew 1 1
Program
Unit cost (USD) $1,100 $450
Units built 2,000,000 11,000,000
Operator countries 60 30

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper? +

The Remington Arms 870 has the lower public unit-cost figure at 450 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Which has the higher effective range? +

The Colt M4A1 has the higher effective range at 500 m.

Which has the higher muzzle velocity? +

The Colt M4A1 has the higher muzzle velocity at 884 m/s.

Which has the higher ammunition? +

The Colt M4A1 has the higher ammunition at 30.

Which has the higher units built? +

The Remington Arms 870 has the higher units built at 11,000,000.

Which has the higher operator countries? +

The Colt M4A1 has the higher operator countries at 60.

Is the Colt M4A1 better than the Remington Arms 870? +

On the public specs we track, the Colt M4A1 leads on 4 of 6 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads