Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome vs Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace NASAMS
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome and Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace NASAMS are both air defense system, compared here on public specifications. The Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome leads on engagement range (70 vs 25 km).
Compare systems side by side
Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.
Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →
Full data
Full spec sheet
| | | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Max speed (Mach) (Mach) | 2.2 Mach | 4 Mach ✓ |
| Engagement range (km) | 70 km ✓ | 25 km |
| Engagement altitude (m) | 10,000 m | 15,000 m ✓ |
| Simultaneous targets | 15 | 72 ✓ |
| Firepower | ||
| Warhead (kg) | 11 kg | 18 kg ✓ |
| Sensors & avionics | ||
| Radar range (km) | 100 km | 120 km ✓ |
| Program | ||
| Unit cost (USD) | $50,000 ✓ | $200,000,000 |
| Operator countries | 4 | 12 ✓ |
Frequently asked questions
Which has the longer engagement range? +
The Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome has the longest engagement range at 70 km.
Which is cheaper? +
The Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome has the lower public unit-cost figure at 50,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.
Which has the higher max speed (mach)? +
The Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace NASAMS has the higher max speed (mach) at 4 Mach.
Which has the higher simultaneous targets? +
The Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace NASAMS has the higher simultaneous targets at 72.
Which has the higher warhead? +
The Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace NASAMS has the higher warhead at 18 kg.
Which has the higher engagement altitude? +
The Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace NASAMS has the higher engagement altitude at 15,000 m.
Is the Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome better than the Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace NASAMS? +
On the public specs we track, the Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace NASAMS leads on 4 of 6 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring