China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 vs MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30)
China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 and MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30) are both air defense system, compared here on public specifications. The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 leads on engagement range (200 vs 120 km). Several China-origin figures here are manufacturer or state claims with limited independent verification, so treat this comparison as directional.
Compare systems side by side
Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.
Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →
Full data
Full spec sheet
 China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9
Wins 4/6 |  MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30)
Wins 2/6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Max speed (Mach) (Mach) | 4.2 Mach | 4.5 Mach ✓ |
| Engagement range (km) | 200 km ✓ | 120 km |
| Engagement altitude (m) | 27,000 m ✓ | 20,000 m |
| Simultaneous targets | 6 | 10 ✓ |
| Firepower | ||
| Warhead (kg) | 180 kg ✓ | 15 kg |
| Sensors & avionics | ||
| Radar range (km) | 300 km ✓ | 140 km |
| Program | ||
| Unit cost (USD) | N/A | $400,000,000 |
| Operator countries | 3 | 3 |
Frequently asked questions
Which has the longer engagement range? +
The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 has the longest engagement range at 200 km.
Which is cheaper? +
The MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30) has the lower public unit-cost figure at 400,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.
Which has the higher max speed (mach)? +
The MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30) has the higher max speed (mach) at 4.5 Mach.
Which has the higher simultaneous targets? +
The MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30) has the higher simultaneous targets at 10.
Which has the higher warhead? +
The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 has the higher warhead at 180 kg.
Which has the higher engagement altitude? +
The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 has the higher engagement altitude at 27,000 m.
Is the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 better than the MBDA SAMP/T (Aster 30)? +
On the public specs we track, the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 leads on 4 of 6 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring
