WeaponSpecs

China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 vs Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome

China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome are both air defense system, compared here on public specifications. The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 leads on engagement range (200 vs 70 km). Several China-origin figures here are manufacturer or state claims with limited independent verification, so treat this comparison as directional.

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 Wins 5/7
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome Wins 2/7
Performance
Max speed (Mach) (Mach) 4.2 Mach 2.2 Mach
Engagement range (km) 200 km 70 km
Engagement altitude (m) 27,000 m 10,000 m
Simultaneous targets 6 15
Firepower
Warhead (kg) 180 kg 11 kg
Sensors & avionics
Radar range (km) 300 km 100 km
Program
Unit cost (USD) N/A $50,000
Operator countries 3 4

Frequently asked questions

Which has the longer engagement range? +

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 has the longest engagement range at 200 km.

Which is cheaper? +

The Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome has the lower public unit-cost figure at 50,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Which has the higher max speed (mach)? +

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 has the higher max speed (mach) at 4.2 Mach.

Which has the higher simultaneous targets? +

The Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome has the higher simultaneous targets at 15.

Which has the higher warhead? +

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 has the higher warhead at 180 kg.

Which has the higher engagement altitude? +

The China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 has the higher engagement altitude at 27,000 m.

Is the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 better than the Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Iron Dome? +

On the public specs we track, the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation HQ-9 leads on 5 of 6 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads