WeaponSpecs

FN Herstal FAL vs Remington Arms 870

FN Herstal FAL and Remington Arms 870 are both rifle & long arms, compared here on public specifications. The FN Herstal FAL leads on effective range (600 vs 40 m).

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.

Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →

Full data

Full spec sheet

FN Herstal FAL Wins 4/5
Remington Arms 870 Wins 1/5
Performance
Effective range (m) 600 m 40 m
Rate of fire (rpm) 650 rpm N/A
Muzzle velocity (m/s) 840 m/s 400 m/s
Firepower
Caliber (mm) 7.6 mm 18.5 mm
Ammunition 20 7
Physical
Length (m) 1.09 m 1 m
Empty weight (kg) 4 kg 3 kg
Crew 1 1
Program
Unit cost (USD) N/A $450
Units built 7,000,000 11,000,000
Operator countries 90 30

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper? +

The Remington Arms 870 has the lower public unit-cost figure at 450 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Which has the higher effective range? +

The FN Herstal FAL has the higher effective range at 600 m.

Which has the higher muzzle velocity? +

The FN Herstal FAL has the higher muzzle velocity at 840 m/s.

Which has the higher ammunition? +

The FN Herstal FAL has the higher ammunition at 20.

Which has the higher units built? +

The Remington Arms 870 has the higher units built at 11,000,000.

Which has the higher operator countries? +

The FN Herstal FAL has the higher operator countries at 90.

Is the FN Herstal FAL better than the Remington Arms 870? +

On the public specs we track, the FN Herstal FAL leads on 4 of 5 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads