Mitsubishi Heavy Industries AAM-4 vs Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries AAM-4 and Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW are both missile, compared here on public specifications. The Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW leads on range (130 vs 100 km).
Compare systems side by side
Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.
Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →
Full data
Full spec sheet
 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries AAM-4
Wins 1/3 |  Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW
Wins 2/3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Max speed (Mach) (Mach) | 4.5 Mach | N/A |
| Range (km) | 100 km | 130 km ✓ |
| Firepower | ||
| Warhead (kg) | 31 kg | 483 kg ✓ |
| Physical | ||
| Length (m) | 3.67 m | 4.06 m |
| Combat weight (kg) | 222 kg | 497 kg |
| Program | ||
| Unit cost (USD) | $450,000 ✓ | $719,012 |
| Operator countries | N/A | 10 |
Frequently asked questions
Which has the longer range? +
The Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW has the longest range at 130 km.
Which is cheaper? +
The Mitsubishi Heavy Industries AAM-4 has the lower public unit-cost figure at 450,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.
Which has the higher warhead? +
The Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW has the higher warhead at 483 kg.
Is the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries AAM-4 better than the Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW? +
On the public specs we track, the Raytheon (RTX) AGM-154 JSOW leads on 2 of 3 headline metrics, see the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring
