Hanwha Aerospace K9 Thunder vs KNDS PzH 2000
Compare systems side by side
Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict — every number from public sources.
Add systems
Search here or add from any product page
See winners
Relative bars + who wins each metric
Decide
Verdict, spec profile, per-spec winners
Full data
Full spec sheet
 Hanwha Aerospace K9 Thunder
Wins 5/7 |  KNDS PzH 2000
Wins 2/7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Max speed (km/h) | 67 km/h ✓ | 60 km/h |
| Range (km) | 360 km | 420 km ✓ |
| Rate of fire (rpm) | 6 rpm | 10 rpm ✓ |
| Firepower | ||
| Caliber (mm) | 155 mm | 155 mm |
| Ammunition | — | 60 |
| Max firing range (km) | 54 km ✓ | 40 km |
| Physical | ||
| Combat weight (kg) | 47,000 kg | 55,300 kg |
| Crew | 5 | 5 |
| Propulsion | ||
| Engine power (hp) | — | 986 hp |
| Program | ||
| Unit cost (USD) | $3,000,000 ✓ | $17,000,000 |
| Units built | 1,900 ✓ | 400 |
| Operator countries | 11 ✓ | 8 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is faster, Hanwha Aerospace K9 Thunder and KNDS PzH 2000? +
The Hanwha Aerospace K9 Thunder is the fastest of the 2 compared here, at 67 km/h.
Which has the longer range? +
The KNDS PzH 2000 has the longest range at 420 km.
Which is cheaper? +
The Hanwha Aerospace K9 Thunder has the lower public unit-cost figure at 3,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional — defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring
