China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) vs Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk
Full specs: China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk
China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) and Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk are both uav / drone, compared here on public specifications. The Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk leads on range (22,780 vs 3,500 km). Several China-origin figures here are manufacturer or state claims with limited independent verification, so treat this comparison as directional.
Compare systems side by side
Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict, every number from public sources.
Building a fleet? Try the Force Builder →
Full data
Full spec sheet
| Performance | ||
| Max speed (km/h) | 235 km/h | 629 km/h ✓ |
| Cruise speed (km/h) | 180 km/h | 575 km/h ✓ |
| Range (km) | 3,500 km | 22,780 km ✓ |
| Service ceiling (m) | 7,000 m | 18,288 m ✓ |
| Endurance (h) | 30 h | 34 h ✓ |
| Firepower | ||
| Hardpoints | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Weapons payload (kg) | 345 kg ✓ | 0 kg |
| Physical | ||
| Length (m) | 8.5 m | 14.5 m |
| Empty weight (kg) | 850 kg | 6,781 kg |
| Combat weight (kg) | 1,330 kg | 14,628 kg |
| Crew | 0 | 0 |
| Propulsion | ||
| Thrust (kN) | N/A | 34 kN |
| Program | ||
| Unit cost (USD) | $4,000,000 ✓ | $140,000,000 |
| Units built | N/A | 45 |
| Operator countries | 10 ✓ | 3 |
Frequently asked questions
Which is faster, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) and Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk? +
The Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk is the fastest of the 2 compared here, at 629 km/h.
Which has the longer range? +
The Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk has the longest range at 22,780 km.
Which carries the larger weapons payload? +
The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) carries the largest weapons payload at 345 kg.
Which is cheaper? +
The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) has the lower public unit-cost figure at 4,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional, defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.
Which has the higher endurance? +
The Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk has the higher endurance at 34 h.
Which has the higher hardpoints? +
The China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) has the higher hardpoints at 6.
Is the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) better than the Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk? +
On the public specs we track, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) and Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk are closely matched, China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) CH-4 (Caihong-4) leads on weapons payload, hardpoints, unit cost, while Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk leads on max speed, range, endurance. See the full spec sheet for the metric-by-metric breakdown.
Where does this comparison data come from? +
Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.
Keep exploring
