WeaponSpecs

Baykar Bayraktar TB2 vs General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict — every number from public sources.

1

Add systems

Search here or add from any product page

2

See winners

Relative bars + who wins each metric

3

Decide

Verdict, spec profile, per-spec winners

Full data

Full spec sheet

Baykar Bayraktar TB2 Wins 3/9
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper Wins 6/9
Performance
Max speed (km/h) 222 km/h 480 km/h
Cruise speed (km/h) 130 km/h 313 km/h
Range (km) 150 km 1,850 km
Service ceiling (m) 8,230 m 15,240 m
Endurance (h) 27 h 27 h
Firepower
Hardpoints 4 7
Weapons payload (kg) 150 kg 1,700 kg
Physical
Length (m) 6.5 m 11 m
Empty weight (kg) 450 kg 2,223 kg
Combat weight (kg) 700 kg 4,760 kg
Crew 0 0
Propulsion
Engine power (hp) 900 hp
Program
Unit cost (USD) $5,000,000 $32,000,000
Units built 500 350
Operator countries 30 15

Frequently asked questions

Which is faster, Baykar Bayraktar TB2 and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper? +

The General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper is the fastest of the 2 compared here, at 480 km/h.

Which has the longer range? +

The General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper has the longest range at 1,850 km.

Which carries the larger weapons payload? +

The General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper carries the largest weapons payload at 1,700 kg.

Which is cheaper? +

The Baykar Bayraktar TB2 has the lower public unit-cost figure at 5,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional — defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads