WeaponSpecs

Baykar Bayraktar Akinci vs General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper

Compare systems side by side

Search above to add up to five systems. You’ll get a per-spec winner, relative bars, a normalized spec profile and an honest verdict — every number from public sources.

1

Add systems

Search here or add from any product page

2

See winners

Relative bars + who wins each metric

3

Decide

Verdict, spec profile, per-spec winners

Full data

Full spec sheet

Baykar Bayraktar Akinci Wins 1/10
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper Wins 9/10
Performance
Max speed (km/h) 361 km/h 480 km/h
Cruise speed (km/h) 250 km/h 313 km/h
Range (km) 300 km 1,850 km
Service ceiling (m) 12,200 m 15,240 m
Endurance (h) 24 h 27 h
Firepower
Hardpoints 6 7
Weapons payload (kg) 1,350 kg 1,700 kg
Physical
Length (m) 12.5 m 11 m
Empty weight (kg) 3,300 kg 2,223 kg
Combat weight (kg) 6,000 kg 4,760 kg
Crew 0 0
Propulsion
Engine power (hp) 900 hp
Program
Unit cost (USD) $30,000,000 $32,000,000
Units built 60 350
Operator countries 5 15

Frequently asked questions

Which is faster, Baykar Bayraktar Akinci and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper? +

The General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper is the fastest of the 2 compared here, at 480 km/h.

Which has the longer range? +

The General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper has the longest range at 1,850 km.

Which carries the larger weapons payload? +

The General Atomics Aeronautical Systems MQ-9A Reaper carries the largest weapons payload at 1,700 kg.

Which is cheaper? +

The Baykar Bayraktar Akinci has the lower public unit-cost figure at 30,000,000 USD. Treat this as directional — defense pricing varies by contract and configuration.

Where does this comparison data come from? +

Every figure in the table is sourced from public manufacturer pages, defense-ministry releases and reference publications, and is verifiable on each system's spec page. WeaponSpecs does not accept vendor placement.

Keep exploring

More head-to-heads